Home » Resources » Case Studies & Whitepapers » Case Study – Navigating the Approval Process

Case Study – Navigating the Approval Process

Printable Version »

bcsmpo logoInternal champions are often instrumental in identifying a need and acquiring the goods they require to get their job done more effectively. Cost/benefit analyses, product literature and references from other organizations are frequent requirements for approval, but the internal champion is the one who maintains the momentum and wins the right to get the tools they need.

Introduction and MPO Profile

It was the internal champion at Bryan/College Station Metropolitan Planning Organization (BSCMPO) who was instrumental in leading the adoption of automated traffic data collection with Miovision at the MPO. Their champion led Miovision’s approvals through the MPO’s Technical Advisory Committee (TAC), their Policy Committee and finally the Texas Department of Transportation (TxDOT).

BCSMPO is located in the City of Bryan, Texas and presides over the cities of Bryan and College Station in Brazos County. The MPO is home to 170,000 people and Texas A&M University.

Bryan/College Station

Scenario

“When the MPO saw the data, they were thrilled. Departments came out of the woodwork to get counts done. We anticipate using Miovision as much as we can moving forward.”

Bart Benthul
BCSMPOTAC

Each fiscal year, the MPO writes a Unified Planning Work Program (UPWP) in cooperation with TXDOT and the local Transit District. The FY2009-2010 UPWP contained a special study to obtain Turning Movement Counts (TMCs) for a set of 15 benchmark intersections, as well as ongoing traffic data collection tasks. These jobs are typically contracted externally with an RFP.

Prior to submission of the UPWP, the BCSMPO evaluated Miovision against the costs of outsourcing a total of 45 TMCs over three years. Cost comparisons showed that Miovision was able to reduce the costs of data collection by 25% per year for a total savings of $5,478, shown in Table 1.

In addition to a cost savings, simplifying data collection with Miovision made data accessible to all members of the MPO.  More departments within the MPO were able to use the data collected and could gain from the reports they were previously unable to access.

For these reasons, the recommendation for Miovision was added to the UPWP.

Table 1: Cost Comparison

Current Count CostsMiovision Count Costs
Including Hardware Capital Investment
15 Turning Movement Counts Per Year$7,200.00$5,373.53
Total Cost in 3 Years$21,600.00$16,120.60

The Approval Process

“The TAC was sold when we found we could get higher quality data at a lower price. Getting the counts easier just built the case for Miovision.”

Bart Benthul
BCSMPO TAC

The recommendation to automate traffic data collection with Miovision had to be submitted for a series of reviews with:

  1. the MPO’s Technical Advisory Committee,
  2. the Policy Committee, and finally,
  3. the Texas Department of Transportation.

Championed by a member of the BCSMPO’s TAC, Miovision successfully passed each level of approvals needed to make the equipment purchase, and be recognized as the preferred traffic data collection method.

At each stage, separate criteria were evaluated, which are outlined in Table 2.

Table 2: BCSMPO Approval Process

CriteriaInformation Provided for Approval
TACEnsuring Miovision’s technology is “tried and true” with other public organizations
  • Case studies and testimonials from public organizations
  • City of Myrtle Beach, SC:
    “We get current and cost effective counts much easier using Miovision.”
Ensuring that data quality remained consistent or better than manual counting
  • Case Study: Montana DOT’s data accuracy validation at 97%
  • Whitepaper: Albeck Gerken’s data accuracy validation at 95% – 96.4%.
Policy
Committee
Ensuring that all of the MPO’s budgeted needs were met
  • TAC presentation to the Policy Committee with how Miovision’s capabilities meet the MPO’s data collection requirements, concluding that the MPO would directly benefit from upgrading.
Mitigating potential public privacy concerns about the use of video by law enforcement to enforce driving infractions
  • Documentation and video captures provided by Miovision describing the capabilities of the cameras and software
  • The Video Collection Unit states on the control box that it is an anonymous vehicle counter
TxDOTEnsuring that the equipment can adequately replace manual counting
  • A hardware and service quote provided by Miovision plus a description of service outlining how Miovision will meet the requirements of the MPO’s
  • Documentation serves as evidence that Miovision’s system fits within the prerogative of the MPO’s data collection program.
Ensuring that the equipment purchase fits into the prerogative of the MPO for data collection

Results

BCSMPO can now easily generate high quality data at a cost savings compared to manual counting. Most intersections have historically required two manual counters from Texas A&M University, doubling the manual counting costs, which means Miovision could potentially save the BCSMPO up to 73% per count. (See fig 1)

Figure 1: At high-volume intersections, two manual counters are required where only one Miovision Video Collection Unit is needed, potentially saving the BCSMPO up to 73% per TMC.

Traffic data can now be acquired and shared more easily throughout the MPO.  The Miovision system is now being used beyond the Engineering Department and data is being requested and used by other members within the MPO.

Want to find out what your data collection system could look like?

Get a detailed quote designed specifically for your counting program today.

Build Your System »

148 Manitou Dr, Suite 101, Kitchener, ON N2C 1L3, Canada | Zeughausstrasse 24, 50667 Köln, Germany
P: 519-513-2407 | TF: 877-646-8476 | F: 866-413-2928 | E: info@miovision.com | Follow us on Twitter @miovision
© 2011 Miovision Technologies Inc. | Privacy